[Graham]

 just 5 days and 3 hrs left to register


   

[Graham]

SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT
I have received a couple of Registration forms with rear tyre widths of 11 &12mm reported. 
The specification is maximum rear tyre width of 10mm across all 4 events.

Most of the Registration forms received to date do not even report the rear tyre width.
So please check your tyres !

[Graham]

As a bit of a teaser, here is the list of the distribution of the car construction types A,B & C

[attachment=33596]

On Thursday barring any last minute changes, the participating cars will be revealed.

[Kevan]

A good chunk of Class A cars and a fairly even spread across the three (ABC)

[Graham]

 Good Morning

IT IS REGISTRATION DAY 

So here is the list of Entrants and cars competing in the proxy

   

Should you believe that you have paid, let me know and I will check my Paypal. But this is based on my email receipts of the payments received so far.
Additionally if you think you are in the wrong Event or class I will check the details you have sent me on the registration form.

Comments
Sadly a few of our regular Teams could not make the journey with us this time around for personal reasons, so we do not have Lifeboats Racing, Mountain View or Groundhogs taking part. But I would hope to see them again in the Autumn Proxy.

Generally speaking we have a fairly even distribution of cars across all 4 Events, and similar mixture of Car Construction types or classes. So we should be in for a good competition all round 

[Kevan]

Scott Sports Marcos... can't wait to see and drive this!

[Savage GT]

I had a Fly Marcos in B with a home printed chassis adapted from a downloaded file, but as I had two I decided not to split the pair, and keep them for home use. 
Scott Sports one should go well, low and decently wide.

Also missing the cut was a a C class Elise with a home designed and printed chassis. Mostly because to look right, I was on the edge of tyre difference (Avant put large rear arches and smaller fronts, and I dont like big arch gaps ) plus ground clearance was marginal to say the least, although I could have sorted that with less offset. But I decided to shelve it in favour of the M1 which is well within those limits.

Had I known there were 3 other C class M1's, I may have persevered 

[Makem]

Scott Sports Marcos... can't wait to see and drive this!

It is quick !!!
Gerry

[Kevan]

I had a Fly Marcos in B with a home printed chassis adapted from a downloaded file, but as I had two I decided not to split the pair, and keep them for home use. 
Scott Sports one should go well, low and decently wide.

Also missing the cut was a a C class Elise with a home designed and printed chassis. Mostly because to look right, I was on the edge of tyre difference (Avant put large rear arches and smaller fronts, and I dont like big arch gaps ) plus ground clearance was marginal to say the least, although I could have sorted that with less offset. But I decided to shelve it in favour of the M1 which is well within those limits.

Had I known there were 3 other C class M1's, I may have persevered 

But it's nice to be different  

I have a couple of Marcos LM's and one day...one day I'll make a chassis for one as it's a much nicer looking car in your hands than in a pic.

[Kevan]

I realised today I was thinking Panoz not Marcos...but still love to see the Marcos as it's in my 'favourites' list.

Of all the Revoslots we've seen at the club the Marcos is the one to beat and the nicest to race.