Posts: 2,312
Threads: 103
Likes Received: 2,374 in 1,119 posts
Likes Given: 7,490
Joined: Mar 2019
Location Farlington, North Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 2,460
Threads: 117
Likes Received: 2,749 in 1,424 posts
Likes Given: 7,293
Joined: Jan 2020
Location Eastbourne UK
Middle lane for my car please.
I love puttering with gears
•
Posts: 1,205
Threads: 141
Likes Received: 1,389 in 612 posts
Likes Given: 734
Joined: Apr 2019
Location Chesterfield, UK
Interesting idea. You could just use the two gutter lanes as a regular track as they are 'non-interference'. The centre lane could run a 'ghost car' or 'jam car' to add a little more jeopardy and spice. Alternatively use two adjacent lanes, the one in the centre wandering all over the place to do the same but with both cars under driver control, etc. Plenty of possibilities.
(This post was last modified: 21st-Aug-20, 07:50 AM by
Top Down.)
Posts: 1,910
Threads: 172
Likes Received: 2,390 in 934 posts
Likes Given: 2,354
Joined: Mar 2019
Location Overijse, Belgium
Honestly - knowing Graham and the fact he is a racer - it will become redundant - from my personal view - either go digital or straight analogue.
In 1:1 - a constantly weaving car will be black flagged .
•
Posts: 1,728
Threads: 256
Likes Received: 1,570 in 802 posts
Likes Given: 1,785
Joined: Apr 2019
Location Edinburgh, Scotland
Hello Jason,
My view on this is flipping between "mad" and "brilliant".
Did it ever get built and trialled?
Leo
Forum Precepts: Don't hijack or divert topics - create a new one. Don't feed the Troll. http://www.scuderiaturini.com
•
Posts: 2,312
Threads: 103
Likes Received: 2,374 in 1,119 posts
Likes Given: 7,490
Joined: Mar 2019
Location Farlington, North Yorkshire, UK
(21st-Aug-20, 07:37 AM)BourneAgainRacer Wrote: Middle lane for my car please.
I imagine that would be potentially the slowest lane, since you'd have two other cars to avoid, where the outer lanes only have one.
(21st-Aug-20, 07:49 AM)Top Down Wrote: Interesting idea. You could just use the two gutter lanes as a regular track as they are 'non-interference'. The centre lane could run a 'ghost car' or 'jam car' to add a little more jeopardy and spice. Alternatively use two adjacent lanes, the one in the centre wandering all over the place to do the same but with both cars under driver control, etc. Plenty of possibilities.
Yes, I think it's part of the plan to use the outer lanes for regular racing.
(21st-Aug-20, 10:23 AM)Scuderia_Turini Wrote: Hello Jason,
My view on this is flipping between "mad" and "brilliant".
Did it ever get built and trialled?
Leo
It's still at the planning stage.
•
Posts: 94
Threads: 4
Likes Received: 103 in 53 posts
Likes Given: 17
Joined: Apr 2019
Location Australia
We raced on a track that had lots of squeezes, it was a somewhat frustrating track because there were limited places you could safely pass. It wasn't uncommon to be stuck behind the car in the lane beside you for ages.
Strategy became get in front as quick as you could and stay there LOL
•
Posts: 3,923
Threads: 661
Likes Received: 8,647 in 3,023 posts
Likes Given: 9,028
Joined: Apr 2019
Location Worthing, UK
It looks to me like the middle lane is near to a 'proper' racing line, which is one of the joys of running digital - whether with others or own your own. It should be the quickest way round and makes a lap a different driving experience from standard-spaced analogue lanes. Squeezing for the sake of squeezing doesn't interest me - but a racing line does.
When racing that lane against others, there will be the disadvantage of having to negotiate cars on both sides. But having raced a lot of 6-car digital races on two lanes, if you're up against good drivers, interactions with the other five cars are fairly infrequent. On a decent-size three lane analogue track (which this is), they'll be a few exciting moments to size up, plan for and execute (or not) - but most of the time will require the usual focus on driving a quick lap.
Another lesson learned from digital is that using 'slower' types of cars gives drivers more time for the race craft - and they are often more forgiving if a manoeuvre goes wrong. It's also important to have rules about contact - and penalties for drivers that cause an incident.
Looking forward to seeing how the idea develops.
(This post was last modified: 22nd-Aug-20, 10:59 AM by
woodcote.)
Posts: 2,312
Threads: 103
Likes Received: 2,374 in 1,119 posts
Likes Given: 7,490
Joined: Mar 2019
Location Farlington, North Yorkshire, UK
I think it's important to remember that there are three different options here...
There is a single lane racing line track for timed runs and testing. There is a two lane layout with no squeezes for regular racing. And of course there is a three lane option for more experienced racers, where overtaking would be more challenging.
I also forgot to mention that it's semi modular, being made up of four tables, so expansion is possible.
Posts: 374
Threads: 42
Likes Received: 901 in 286 posts
Likes Given: 1
Joined: Aug 2019
Location Toronto, Canada
I do think that if used as a two lane racing circuit,(or single lane test/tune layout) it will be great.........if/when used as a 3 lane circuit, there are far too many "squeeze" portions which severely limit passing opportunities (usually into /out of corners)
Cheers
Chris Walker
•