Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Viability of 3D Scans - 2022
#13

It always looks like such a dirty technology, which seems to create millions of unnecessary vertices, and has no intrinsic understanding of shape and form.

It would surely be simpler, and cleaner to model a shape like that, rather than scan it.

Actually, I think we're still at the stage where you'd probably be better handing it over to a skilled carver and casting it.
[+] 2 members Like JasonB's post
Quote


Messages In This Thread
Viability of 3D Scans - 2022 - by MrFlippant - 14th-Jan-22, 05:29 PM
RE: Viability of 3D Scans - by Kevan - 14th-Jan-22, 09:21 PM
RE: Viability of 3D Scans - by MrFlippant - 14th-Jan-22, 10:22 PM
RE: Viability of 3D Scans - by Kevan - 14th-Jan-22, 10:31 PM
RE: Viability of 3D Scans - by KensRedZed - 15th-Jan-22, 10:24 PM
RE: Viability of 3D Scans - by MrFlippant - 16th-Jan-22, 01:28 AM
RE: Viability of 3D Scans - by KensRedZed - 16th-Jan-22, 04:07 AM
RE: Viability of 3D Scans - by Kevan - 18th-Jan-22, 07:45 PM
RE: Viability of 3D Scans - by MrFlippant - 16th-Jan-22, 06:01 AM
RE: Viability of 3D Scans - 2022 - by GT40Racer - 18th-Jan-22, 02:10 PM
RE: Viability of 3D Scans - 2022 - by MrFlippant - 18th-Jan-22, 07:32 PM
RE: Viability of 3D Scans - 2022 - by MrFlippant - 19th-Jan-22, 01:26 AM
RE: Viability of 3D Scans - 2022 - by JasonB - 19th-Jan-22, 02:32 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)