26th-Oct-21, 05:36 PM
Similarly with #202, there were two #201s in the November 1965 edition, and then they carried on with #203 in December.
So again it was probably just a mistake with numbering.
So again it was probably just a mistake with numbering.

![[+]](https://slotracer.online/community/images/bootbb/collapse_collapsed.png)