14th-May-25, 05:02 PM
(14th-May-25, 03:36 PM)AdeC Wrote: Just thinking aloud here... What's the reasoning behind limiting Event 1 to being a Revoslot only class and not allowing the likes of the Slot It 510? Surely they play reasonably well together? Even a well modified Scalextric Escort, Fly Alfa Giulia GTA/GTV or Spirit BMW 2002 could potentially keep pace.
It is something I have considered beforehand and I was interested to see what Slot it were proposing to introduce in the period prior to this proxy taking place. Obviously from the introduction of the BMW M30, they are not following the same path as Revoslot and are introducing a much wider range of Touring cars in the future. I did ask them if a stable mate for the Datsun was on the drawing board, but they are keeping their cards close to the chest, and was told “well maybe in the future” type response.
So that leaves us with the one Datsun car from Slot it and the not so cheap alternatives of Fly or Scalex equivalents as scratchbuild with added parts. From my experience the 60’s period cars of this type are not likely to draw many entries, but no doubt the Slot it Datsun would.
So I might expect there to be mostly Revoslot entries anyway with a similar number of Slot it Datsun only ones as entrants seem to prefer the latest released type cars, rather then the more challenging builds.
One thing I do know is that at least 5 of our current proxy “club members” have entered the US based Revoslot Gp2 proxy last year. They of course may not want to participate in this UK re-run based on their experience last time, but we are creatures of habit

The other point which impressed me is that there was a fairly unpredictable set of results in terms of cars entered, and the average variation was very small. Similar to our experience with the current Revo GT proxy cars. So that in itself gives a more unpredictable outcome, which is surely more entertaining in general.
If I thought I could fill the Event with a more balanced field of cars otherwise, I probably would prefer it that way, but I fear I would perhaps “muddy the water” by having too much choice in the event which is unlikely to attract a lot of entries and might put off those which prefer a simple Class structure to race against.
In reality I have generated 3 events which offer different build structures in each, which perhaps is easier to follow than using my earlier proxy modelling methods.
But at this point I am open to the views of others, and could even prepare a census around the specific issue regarding Event 1 structure perhaps ??