Posts: 1,680
Threads: 159
Likes Received: 1,924 in 790 posts
Likes Given: 1,918
Joined: Mar 2019
Location Overijse, Belgium
Initially 1/32nd - it iswider than standard -thought it may fit in with this build :)
There is a revell 1/24th available - although not the Lotus - Porsche version...
•
Posts: 320
Threads: 37
Likes Received: 710 in 242 posts
Likes Given: 1
Joined: Aug 2019
Location Toronto, Canada
(21st-Apr-20, 09:18 PM)abie321 Wrote: Initially 1/32nd - it iswider than standard -thought it may fit in with this build :)
There is a revell 1/24th available - although not the Lotus - Porsche version...
I have the Revell 1/24 version..........likely my next build !!........also have the "bloated" Eldon, and the Russkit.......neither of these will get built.
Cheers
Chris Walker
•
Posts: 145
Threads: 10
Likes Received: 419 in 116 posts
Likes Given: 377
Joined: Apr 2020
Location South Sweden
Here is a pic of the underside of the shell to show what space there is. Outside width is now correct, inside it can be made wider.
Meanwhile, work on the body goes on.
Having sanding it down to the right dimensions. I give it a thin layer of primer to better see what more there is to do.
So far it is all lime-tree. Next will be to work on the front and the tail. For the grille area, I will use styrene. The weight at present is 10g.
Carver
(This post was last modified: 22nd-Apr-20, 06:27 AM by
Carver.)
Posts: 1,680
Threads: 159
Likes Received: 1,924 in 790 posts
Likes Given: 1,918
Joined: Mar 2019
Location Overijse, Belgium
•
Posts: 18
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 11 in 6 posts
Likes Given: 4
Joined: Apr 2020
The tyranny of numbers....While Carver is making (should I say outstanding) progress on the coachwork, EM is still, literally, scratching along with pencil on paper:
The current arithmetic - The critical measurement is the width of the body at the back of the rear tires. On my drawing I make that to be 44.2mm. Now, assuming my esteemed colleague can come up with some magic material to reduce the thickness in that region to 1.5 mm on each side, that means that the O/A width of the axle/wheel/tire combination must be a bit less than 41 mm (allowing for a bit of clearance)
One set of gears arrived today. The spur gear is a fine example of minimalism measuring just 4 mm over the hub. The 13" X 5 mm wheels from RS Slotracing are currently in transit - looking at the photo and using an "eyeball optical comparator" I'm going to guess 7mm over the hub so....
4 mm + 2 X 7mm = 18 mm - now add a motor:
FF 050 (soldered in with no allowance for screw mounting) 30.65 mm - adding 18 mm and rounding..."Houston, we have a problem"
Plan "B" .. Bear dog or equivalent FF 030 motor - motor, gear, wheels all fit with space left over for a set of golf clubs! - This is a small car and the shell is looking very light so the small motor might have adequate power (and brakes)
Options? FF 050 motor in an angle winder configuration (more complex chassis - not a lot of experience here with that style) Different wheels - A CB design 14" X 6mm wheel - "hub less" design and perhaps enough meat to turn off another 0.5 mm - 5.5 mm instead of 7 mm but still not there for the 050 sidewinder.
The noise you may be hearing in the background is the grinding of mental gears....
To be continued..
EM
•
Posts: 320
Threads: 37
Likes Received: 710 in 242 posts
Likes Given: 1
Joined: Aug 2019
Location Toronto, Canada
Al, why would an anglewinder configuration make you think you needed different rear wheels ???
Cheers
Chris Walker
•
Posts: 18
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 11 in 6 posts
Likes Given: 4
Joined: Apr 2020
(22nd-Apr-20, 09:20 PM)chrisguyw Wrote: Al, why would an anglewinder configuration make you think you needed different rear wheels ???
Cheers
Chris Walker
Just misplaced sentence order - punctuation "angle winder" as one possible approach - different wheels an attempt to find a few mm more for the sidewinder config. - no link between them.
Al
•
Posts: 18
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 11 in 6 posts
Likes Given: 4
Joined: Apr 2020
Latest thoughts: Push the angle winder approach a little farther; A motor "harness" to couple motor to axle. provide a rear body mount and use a "bolt-in" motor fastening so it can be changed out without rebuilding the chassis:
0.050" stainless steel sheet cut and bent per sketch:
pluses: no soldering to motor, 3/16" ID axle carrier tube will accommodate ball bearings (in hand)
minuses: added weight
unknowns: motor/axle connection sufficiently rigid? Will it fit? (next step is scale dwg) Fabrication - cut, saw & file or laser cut (?$?)
Feels good to have something resembling progress instead just meandering in circles.
Comments & suggestions please
EM
•
Posts: 1,680
Threads: 159
Likes Received: 1,924 in 790 posts
Likes Given: 1,918
Joined: Mar 2019
Location Overijse, Belgium
I would love to have seen the end of this project........
•